> ## Documentation Index
> Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.sleuthintel.io/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

# Sleuth Final Review v23 - Full Doc Set

> Original Sleuth document.

<div style={{ margin: "-24px -32px", width: "calc(100% + 64px)" }}>
  <iframe title="Sleuth Final Review v23 - Full Doc Set" srcDoc={"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html lang=\"en\">\n<head>\n<meta charset=\"UTF-8\">\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0\">\n<title>SLEUTH Final Review v23 \u00b7 Full Doc Set</title>\n<style>\n  @import url('https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Share+Tech+Mono&family=Orbitron:wght@400;700;900&display=swap');\n  *, *::before, *::after { box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0; padding: 0; }\n  :root {\n    --green: #00FF66; --green-dim: #00cc52; --green-glow: rgba(0,255,102,0.3);\n    --green-faint: rgba(0,255,102,0.06); --bg: #060606; --card: #0c0c0c;\n    --border: #1a1a1a; --text: #d0d0d0; --gold: #FFD700; --gold-glow: rgba(255,215,0,0.25);\n    --red: #ff4444; --red-glow: rgba(255,68,68,0.2);\n  }\n  html { scroll-behavior: smooth; scroll-padding-top: 52px; }\n  body { font-family: 'Share Tech Mono', monospace; background: var(--bg); color: var(--text); line-height: 1.8; overflow-x: hidden; }\n  body::after { content:'';position:fixed;inset:0;background:repeating-linear-gradient(0deg,transparent,transparent 2px,rgba(0,0,0,0.1) 2px,rgba(0,0,0,0.1) 4px);pointer-events:none;z-index:1; }\n  body::before { content:'';position:fixed;inset:0;background:radial-gradient(ellipse at center,transparent 50%,rgba(0,0,0,0.6) 100%);pointer-events:none;z-index:1; }\n  .container { position:relative;z-index:2;max-width:920px;margin:0 auto;padding:40px 24px 100px; }\n  .header { text-align:center;padding:80px 0 50px;border-bottom:1px solid var(--border);margin-bottom:60px;position:relative;overflow:hidden; }\n  .header-glow { position:absolute;top:50%;left:50%;transform:translate(-50%,-50%);width:600px;height:300px;background:radial-gradient(ellipse,rgba(0,255,102,0.05) 0%,transparent 70%);pointer-events:none; }\n  .logo { font-family:'Orbitron',sans-serif;font-size:56px;font-weight:900;color:var(--green);text-shadow:0 0 10px var(--green),0 0 30px var(--green),0 0 70px var(--green);letter-spacing:14px;margin-bottom:18px;display:inline-block; }\n  .doc-type { font-size:11px;color:var(--green-dim);text-transform:uppercase;letter-spacing:6px;margin-bottom:10px; }\n  .doc-subtitle { font-size:13px;color:var(--gold);letter-spacing:2px;margin-bottom:20px; }\n  .meta-row { display:flex;justify-content:center;gap:10px;flex-wrap:wrap; }\n  .meta-badge { border:1px solid rgba(0,255,102,0.3);color:var(--green);font-size:10px;letter-spacing:2px;text-transform:uppercase;padding:4px 12px; }\n  .toc{background:var(--card);border:1px solid var(--border);padding:24px 28px;margin-bottom:60px;}\n  .toc-title{font-family:'Orbitron',sans-serif;font-size:11px;color:var(--green);letter-spacing:4px;text-transform:uppercase;margin-bottom:14px;}\n  .toc-list{list-style:none;display:grid;grid-template-columns:1fr 1fr;gap:6px 24px;}\n  .toc-list a{color:var(--gold);text-decoration:none;font-size:12px;}\n  .toc-list a:hover{color:var(--green);}\n  .section{margin-bottom:70px;}\n  .section-number{font-size:11px;color:var(--green-dim);letter-spacing:4px;text-transform:uppercase;margin-bottom:8px;}\n  h2{font-family:'Orbitron',sans-serif;font-size:26px;color:var(--green);text-shadow:0 0 14px var(--green-glow);margin-bottom:20px;letter-spacing:2px;}\n  p{margin-bottom:16px;font-size:13px;color:var(--text);}\n  strong{color:var(--gold);}\n  .highlight{background:var(--green-faint);border:1px solid rgba(0,255,102,0.12);padding:20px 24px;margin:20px 0;position:relative;}\n  .highlight::before{content:'//';position:absolute;top:-11px;left:18px;background:var(--bg);padding:0 8px;color:var(--green);font-size:11px;}\n  .highlight p{margin:0;}\n  .score-grid{display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(3,1fr);gap:12px;margin:24px 0;}\n  .score-box{background:var(--card);border:1px solid var(--border);padding:20px 18px;text-align:center;position:relative;}\n  .score-box::after{content:'';position:absolute;bottom:0;left:0;width:100%;height:2px;background:var(--green);box-shadow:0 0 6px var(--green-glow);}\n  .score-box.down::after{background:var(--red);box-shadow:0 0 6px var(--red-glow);}\n  .score-val{font-family:'Orbitron',sans-serif;font-size:28px;color:var(--green);text-shadow:0 0 12px var(--green-glow);line-height:1;margin-bottom:6px;}\n  .score-box.down .score-val{color:var(--red);text-shadow:0 0 12px var(--red-glow);}\n  .score-label{font-size:10px;color:var(--gold);text-transform:uppercase;letter-spacing:2px;}\n  .score-delta{font-size:10px;color:var(--green);margin-top:6px;letter-spacing:1px;}\n  .score-box.down .score-delta{color:var(--red);}\n  .delta-grid{display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(2,1fr);gap:12px;margin:20px 0;}\n  .delta-card{background:var(--card);border:1px solid rgba(0,255,102,0.15);padding:16px 20px;display:flex;align-items:flex-start;gap:14px;}\n  .delta-icon{font-family:'Orbitron',sans-serif;font-size:20px;color:var(--green);flex-shrink:0;width:32px;text-align:center;}\n  .delta-text{font-size:12px;color:var(--gold);line-height:1.6;}\n  .delta-title{font-family:'Orbitron',sans-serif;font-size:10px;color:var(--green);letter-spacing:2px;margin-bottom:4px;}\n  .progress-row{display:grid;grid-template-columns:170px 1fr 60px;align-items:center;gap:14px;margin-bottom:12px;}\n  .progress-label{font-size:11px;color:var(--gold);text-transform:uppercase;letter-spacing:1px;}\n  .progress-bar-bg{background:#111;height:6px;position:relative;}\n  .progress-bar-fill{height:100%;background:var(--green);box-shadow:0 0 8px var(--green-glow);}\n  .progress-bar-fill.red{background:var(--red);box-shadow:0 0 8px var(--red-glow);}\n  .progress-val{font-family:'Orbitron',sans-serif;font-size:12px;color:var(--green);text-align:right;}\n  .tagline-card{background:linear-gradient(135deg,rgba(0,255,102,0.08),rgba(255,215,0,0.04),transparent);border:1px solid rgba(0,255,102,0.25);padding:40px 36px;margin:28px 0;text-align:center;position:relative;overflow:hidden;}\n  .tagline-card::before{content:'VERDICT';position:absolute;top:-10px;left:24px;background:var(--bg);padding:0 10px;color:var(--green);font-size:10px;letter-spacing:3px;font-family:'Orbitron',sans-serif;font-weight:900;}\n  .tagline-big{font-family:'Orbitron',sans-serif;font-size:22px;color:var(--green);text-shadow:0 0 18px var(--green-glow);line-height:1.4;margin-bottom:12px;}\n  .tagline-sub{font-size:12px;color:var(--gold);font-style:italic;}\n  .disc-card{background:rgba(255,68,68,0.04);border:1px solid rgba(255,68,68,0.2);border-left:3px solid var(--red);padding:20px 24px;margin:16px 0;}\n  .disc-card.amber{background:rgba(255,215,0,0.04);border-color:rgba(255,215,0,0.2);border-left-color:var(--gold);}\n  .disc-title{font-family:'Orbitron',sans-serif;font-size:11px;color:var(--red);letter-spacing:3px;text-transform:uppercase;margin-bottom:10px;}\n  .disc-card.amber .disc-title{color:var(--gold);}\n  .disc-text{font-size:13px;color:var(--gold);line-height:1.7;}\n  .point{margin-bottom:24px;padding-bottom:20px;border-bottom:1px dashed rgba(255,215,0,0.1);}\n  .point:last-child{border-bottom:none;}\n  .point-title{font-family:'Orbitron',sans-serif;font-size:14px;color:var(--gold);margin-bottom:10px;}\n  .point-label{display:inline-block;background:rgba(0,255,102,0.08);color:var(--green);padding:2px 10px;font-size:10px;text-transform:uppercase;letter-spacing:2px;margin-right:8px;font-family:'Orbitron',sans-serif;font-weight:700;border:1px solid rgba(0,255,102,0.3);}\n  .point-label.watch{background:rgba(255,215,0,0.08);color:var(--gold);border-color:rgba(255,215,0,0.3);}\n  .point-text{color:var(--gold);font-size:13px;line-height:1.7;}\n  table{width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;margin:20px 0;font-size:12px;}\n  th{background:rgba(0,255,102,0.07);color:var(--green);text-align:left;padding:12px 14px;border:1px solid var(--border);font-family:'Orbitron',sans-serif;font-size:10px;text-transform:uppercase;letter-spacing:1px;}\n  td{padding:11px 14px;border:1px solid var(--border);background:var(--card);color:var(--gold);font-size:12px;}\n  td.green{color:var(--green);font-weight:700;}\n  td.red{color:var(--red);font-weight:700;}\n  .footer{text-align:center;padding:50px 0 30px;border-top:1px solid var(--border);margin-top:40px;}\n  .footer-logo{font-family:'Orbitron',sans-serif;font-size:22px;color:var(--green);letter-spacing:10px;text-shadow:0 0 16px var(--green-glow);margin-bottom:10px;}\n  .footer-text{font-size:10px;color:var(--gold);letter-spacing:3px;text-transform:uppercase;}\n  @media(max-width:680px){.logo{font-size:38px;letter-spacing:8px;}.toc-list{grid-template-columns:1fr;}.score-grid{grid-template-columns:1fr;}.delta-grid{grid-template-columns:1fr;}h2{font-size:22px;}.tagline-big{font-size:18px;}.progress-row{grid-template-columns:120px 1fr 44px;}}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n\n<div class=\"container\">\n\n<div class=\"header\">\n  <div class=\"header-glow\"></div>\n  <div class=\"doc-type\">// Internal Brief</div>\n  <div class=\"logo\">SLEUTH</div>\n  <div class=\"doc-subtitle\">Final Review v23 \u00b7 WP Final \u00b7 Full Doc Set \u00b7 Public vs Internal Split \u00b7 Scores \u00b7 Stress Test \u00b7 Verdict</div>\n  <div class=\"meta-row\">\n    <span class=\"meta-badge\">v23 Final Review</span>\n    <span class=\"meta-badge\">vs v22</span>\n    <span class=\"meta-badge\">30 Docs Reviewed</span>\n    <span class=\"meta-badge\">5 Public</span>\n    <span class=\"meta-badge\">July 2026</span>\n    <span class=\"meta-badge\">Internal Only</span>\n  </div>\n</div>\n\n<div class=\"toc\">\n  <div class=\"toc-title\">// Contents</div>\n  <ul class=\"toc-list\">\n    <li><a href=\"#s1\">01 \u00b7 Scores</a></li>\n    <li><a href=\"#s4\">04 \u00b7 Stress Test</a></li>\n    <li><a href=\"#s2\">02 \u00b7 What Changed Since v22</a></li>\n    <li><a href=\"#s5\">05 \u00b7 Open Items</a></li>\n    <li><a href=\"#s3\">03 \u00b7 Doc Set Audit</a></li>\n    <li><a href=\"#s6\">06 \u00b7 Verdict</a></li>\n  </ul>\n</div>\n\n<div class=\"section\" id=\"s1\">\n  <div class=\"section-number\">Section 01</div>\n  <h2>Scores \u00b7 Final</h2>\n  <p>This review reads the full set, 30 documents, against the final whitepaper as master, and for the first time the set splits into a declared public tier and everything else. The five public docs, the <strong>Whitepaper, the 2-Pager, the Brief, the Simulation Receipts, and the Degen Edition</strong>, are aligned with each other on every economic surface checked: raise, listing price, FDV, allocations, float, tiers, licences, grade curve, slashing, product state. That has never been true of any prior release. What v22 flagged as the whole problem, the outward-facing docs contradicting the master, is closed.</p>\n\n  <div class=\"score-grid\">\n    <div class=\"score-box\"><div class=\"score-val\">9.8</div><div class=\"score-label\">Mechanics Clarity</div><div class=\"score-delta\">= v22</div></div>\n    <div class=\"score-box\"><div class=\"score-val\">9.8</div><div class=\"score-label\">Narrative Strength</div><div class=\"score-delta\">+0.1 vs v22</div></div>\n    <div class=\"score-box\"><div class=\"score-val\">9.6</div><div class=\"score-label\">Investor Readiness</div><div class=\"score-delta\">+0.7 vs v22</div></div>\n    <div class=\"score-box\"><div class=\"score-val\">9.8</div><div class=\"score-label\">Feature Specificity</div><div class=\"score-delta\">= v22</div></div>\n    <div class=\"score-box down\"><div class=\"score-val\">9.8</div><div class=\"score-label\">Token Model Rigour</div><div class=\"score-delta\">\u22120.1 vs v22</div></div>\n    <div class=\"score-box\"><div class=\"score-val\">9.7</div><div class=\"score-label\">Overall</div><div class=\"score-delta\">+0.2 vs v22</div></div>\n  </div>\n\n  <div class=\"progress-row\"><div class=\"progress-label\">Mechanics Clarity</div><div class=\"progress-bar-bg\"><div class=\"progress-bar-fill\" style=\"width:98%;\"></div></div><div class=\"progress-val\">9.8</div></div>\n  <div class=\"progress-row\"><div class=\"progress-label\">Narrative Strength</div><div class=\"progress-bar-bg\"><div class=\"progress-bar-fill\" style=\"width:98%;\"></div></div><div class=\"progress-val\">9.8</div></div>\n  <div class=\"progress-row\"><div class=\"progress-label\">Investor Readiness</div><div class=\"progress-bar-bg\"><div class=\"progress-bar-fill\" style=\"width:96%;\"></div></div><div class=\"progress-val\">9.6</div></div>\n  <div class=\"progress-row\"><div class=\"progress-label\">Feature Specificity</div><div class=\"progress-bar-bg\"><div class=\"progress-bar-fill\" style=\"width:98%;\"></div></div><div class=\"progress-val\">9.8</div></div>\n  <div class=\"progress-row\"><div class=\"progress-label\">Token Model Rigour</div><div class=\"progress-bar-bg\"><div class=\"progress-bar-fill red\" style=\"width:98%;\"></div></div><div class=\"progress-val\">9.8</div></div>\n\n  <div class=\"highlight\"><p><strong>Headline: 9.7 overall, up from 9.5, and the gain is exactly where v22 said it would come from.</strong> The public tier is coherent for the first time: five documents, one parameter set, and a sim doc rebuilt from scratch on the final tokenomics instead of patched. Investor Readiness recovers from 8.9 to 9.6 because the 2-pager that was blocking is rebuilt and clean, the Brief is a genuinely strong front door, and the float is stated before anyone can compute it adversarially. Token Model Rigour eases to 9.8 for one reason only: the ladder that explained how the full liquidity allocation deploys against the raise was removed from the model, and no paragraph replaced it. That question, how 23.25% of supply sits in a pool against $250K of ETH at $0.05, is the single mechanical gap left in an otherwise complete release, covered in stress test 04. Everything else on the open list is internal housekeeping.</p></div>\n</div>\n\n<div class=\"section\" id=\"s2\">\n  <div class=\"section-number\">Section 02</div>\n  <h2>What Changed Since v22</h2>\n  <p>v22 to Final is a repositioning, not a polish. The tokenomics moved again, this time down instead of up, and the doc set reorganised around a public tier.</p>\n\n  <div class=\"delta-grid\">\n    <div class=\"delta-card\"><div class=\"delta-icon\">\u2605</div><div class=\"delta-text\"><div class=\"delta-title\">Tokenomics Repositioned to the Floor</div>$30M FDV at $0.30 with a 14-rung ladder became $5M FDV at $0.05: a $250K community raise, 100% into the pool, a 35% bonus at month 1, ~$0.037 effective entry, 8.5% true day-one holder float, everything calendar-vested by month 25. The entry moved from a claim the ladder had to earn to a floor the market can only argue up from.</div></div>\n    <div class=\"delta-card\"><div class=\"delta-icon\">\u2605</div><div class=\"delta-text\"><div class=\"delta-title\">The Simulation Receipts</div>All six sims rerun on the final parameter set and shipped as one public document with a how-to-read section, sensitivity sweeps, a claims ledger mapping every WP claim to its backing number, and limits stated next to every headline. Closes v22 open item 03 by replacement instead of reconciliation, which is the better fix.</div></div>\n    <div class=\"delta-card\"><div class=\"delta-icon\">+</div><div class=\"delta-text\"><div class=\"delta-title\">Verifier Bar Decision Resolved</div>v22's open decision, the WP's $1,500 Tier 3 bar against the Flywheel T2 sim's $1,000 Tier 2 recommendation, is settled: the final WP sets the verifier licence at $1,000, the same bar as hunting, exactly what the project's own research recommended. Open item 02 from v22, closed.</div></div>\n    <div class=\"delta-card\"><div class=\"delta-icon\">\u2605</div><div class=\"delta-text\"><div class=\"delta-title\">2-Pager Rebuilt</div>The single blocking item from v22 is done. The new 2-pager is a mechanism overview plus a full system map, aligned with the WP on every number checked: tiers, thresholds, licences, grade curve, slash grades, epoch mechanics, revenue split. An investor reading it next to the WP finds one document, twice.</div></div>\n    <div class=\"delta-card\"><div class=\"delta-icon\">+</div><div class=\"delta-text\"><div class=\"delta-title\">The Brief Added</div>A one-page launch narrative built around the receipts: zero VC, the raise is the pool, the payroll, the rank, the watchable machine. Aligned with the WP on every claim checked and it names the WP as winning on conflict, right in the footer. The strongest cold-open asset in the set.</div></div>\n    <div class=\"delta-card\"><div class=\"delta-icon\">~</div><div class=\"delta-text\"><div class=\"delta-title\">Degen Edition Updated</div>Re-aligned to the final numbers end to end. Two cosmetic nits for the polish pass: a duplicated phrase in the wage schedule caption (\"Work in month NWork in month N\") and \"1,500+ simulated months\" where the receipts doc says 2,700+.</div></div>\n    <div class=\"delta-card\"><div class=\"delta-icon\">~</div><div class=\"delta-text\"><div class=\"delta-title\">Build Spec v2 Refreshed</div>The dev spec now defers to the WP explicitly, carries the $1,000 licence, the machine lane validators, tariff rules, and the epoch jobs. One leftover: the W6-12 timeline still says billing comes online at $30/mo. One find-and-replace from clean.</div></div>\n    <div class=\"delta-card\"><div class=\"delta-icon\">+</div><div class=\"delta-text\"><div class=\"delta-title\">Public / Internal Split Formalised</div>Five documents declared public, everything else internal. This is the structural fix for the drift problem both v16 and v22 documented: the surface that must never contradict itself is now small, named, and currently clean. The internal docs can lag without an investor ever seeing it.</div></div>\n  </div>\n</div>\n\n<div class=\"section\" id=\"s3\">\n  <div class=\"section-number\">Section 03</div>\n  <h2>Doc Set Audit</h2>\n  <p>Every doc checked against the final WP on the surfaces that matter. The public tier is held to the outward standard: any contradiction is red. Internal docs are held to a usefulness standard: superseded means a current doc replaced it and it should be archived so nobody reads a dropped design as current; stale means it carries pre-final numbers and needs a pass before use.</p>\n\n  <table>\n    <tr><th>Doc</th><th>Status</th><th>What's Wrong / Right</th></tr>\n    <tr><td class=\"green\">Whitepaper Final \u00b7 PUBLIC</td><td class=\"green\">Master \u00b7 clean</td><td>Internally consistent on every surface checked: allocations sum, float math checks (23.25 + 5 + 3.5 = 31.75), release dollars check ($28K + $24K + $13K \u2248 $66K/mo), lifetime totals hit the $5M FDV exactly. Terminology holds. One open question inside it, stress test 04.</td></tr>\n    <tr><td class=\"green\">The Brief \u00b7 PUBLIC</td><td class=\"green\">Aligned</td><td>Every number matches the WP: $250K, $0.05, $87.5K month 1 bonus, ~$66K/mo, month 25 full vest, 8.5% holder float stated. Carries one claim the WP doesn't make (\"first token economy on Robinhood Chain\"), stress test 08.</td></tr>\n    <tr><td class=\"green\">Simulation Receipts \u00b7 PUBLIC</td><td class=\"green\">Aligned</td><td>One shared parameter set matching the final tokenomics, stated at the top. The claims ledger and the limits sections are the right epistemic posture for a public sim doc. The 8.5% float figure reconciles with the WP's 5 + 3.5.</td></tr>\n    <tr><td class=\"green\">2-Pager \u00b7 PUBLIC</td><td class=\"green\">Aligned \u00b7 1 nit</td><td>Clean on every mechanism number. The nit: all three pages are stamped \"Private &amp; Confidential\" on a doc now declared public. Either the stamp goes or the doc isn't public; pick one.</td></tr>\n    <tr><td class=\"green\">Degen Edition \u00b7 PUBLIC</td><td class=\"green\">Aligned \u00b7 2 nits</td><td>Matches the final WP on tiers, licences, raise, float, roadmap. The duplicated caption phrase and the 1,500-vs-2,700 months figure are the only blemishes on the public tier.</td></tr>\n    <tr><td class=\"green\">Build Spec v2 \u00b7 Tree of Knowledge v2</td><td class=\"green\">Current \u00b7 1 number</td><td>The dev pair is in good shape: WP named as winning on conflict, $1,000 licence, validators, tariffs, epoch jobs all current. The lone $30/mo in the build spec timeline is the only stale constant found.</td></tr>\n    <tr><td class=\"green\">Exposure Map v1 \u00b7 Institutional Bounties v4</td><td class=\"green\">Compatible</td><td>No contradictions with the final economics. Both still correctly gate themselves as pending and keep bounty pools additive to the public ceiling. Same position as v22.</td></tr>\n    <tr><td class=\"green\">Flywheel Verifier T2 \u00b7 Sim v1 + sleuth_sim.py</td><td class=\"green\">Historical \u00b7 adopted</td><td>The T2 doc's recommendation is now the shipped rule, so it graduates from open contradiction to design record. Sim v1 is the ancestor of Receipts Sim 01. Keep both as provenance, mark them historical so nobody cites the old constants.</td></tr>\n    <tr><td class=\"red\">Sim Series v1 \u00b7 Sim v4 (60-mo) \u00b7 Price Path v4</td><td class=\"red\">Superseded</td><td>All three run v20-era constants ($0.30 list, 20% pool, 1.6%/mo) that two tokenomics revisions have since replaced. The Receipts doc reruns everything they cover on the final parameter set. Nothing to fix, everything to archive: stamp them superseded so the old numbers can't be quoted as current.</td></tr>\n    <tr><td class=\"red\">Sim v5 Ladder</td><td class=\"red\">Superseded \u00b7 design dropped</td><td>Models a 14-rung ladder that no longer exists in the final tokenomics. It's the strongest single argument for why the ladder question in stress test 04 needs an answer on paper, but as a live doc it now describes a design the WP walked away from. Archive with a note recording why.</td></tr>\n    <tr><td class=\"red\">BD Targets v3 \u00b7 Beta Checklist \u00b7 Actors &amp; Barriers</td><td class=\"red\">Stale \u00b7 carried from v22</td><td>Still pitching $30/mo and six sections, still anchored to WP v15-era numbers. Same finding as v22, unchanged. Internal only so nothing is blocking, but the BD playbook's own rule against underselling past the WP still applies to itself.</td></tr>\n    <tr><td class=\"red\">Most Wanted Spec v1 \u00b7 Build Brief v1</td><td class=\"red\">Stale anchor \u00b7 carried</td><td>Both still pinned to WP v15.1 and the build brief still says conveyor seven times. The mechanisms survive the reprice, so this remains a find-and-replace plus a re-anchor, not a redesign. Same as v22, plus one more version of drift.</td></tr>\n    <tr><td class=\"green\">Intel Reports \u00b7 Rothera Research \u00b7 Wallet Analyzer specs \u00b7 MVP Export</td><td class=\"green\">Fine as-is</td><td>Product audits and feature specs describing the build rather than the economics. Passing $30 references in the intel reports are harmless in context, unchanged from v22.</td></tr>\n  </table>\n\n  <div class=\"highlight\"><p><strong>The pattern in one line: the five docs the world sees agree with each other, and everything that doesn't agree is behind the wall.</strong> That is the correct end state the last two reviews were pushing toward. What remains is labeling: four superseded sim docs and five stale internal docs need their status stamped so the archive can't ambush anyone.</p></div>\n</div>\n\n<div class=\"section\" id=\"s4\">\n  <div class=\"section-number\">Section 04</div>\n  <h2>Stress Test</h2>\n  <p>Standard pushes, rerun against the final tokenomics with the public five behind it. The attacks flipped direction this release: v22 defended a $30M FDV as not too high, Final defends a $5M FDV as not too low.</p>\n\n  <div class=\"point\">\n    <div class=\"point-title\">01 \u00b7 $5M FDV with a live product. Isn't that leaving money on the table?</div>\n    <span class=\"point-label\">Holds</span>\n    <div class=\"point-text\">The framing carries it: the listing is a floor, not a valuation claim, and the WP explicitly says the market decides everything from there. The receipts back the posture, the price-path multiples are large because the entry is small, and the doc says exactly that rather than selling 26x as a promise. A cheap honest entry with an 8.5% holder float is a much easier position to defend than an ambitious one, and the low FDV converts the sharpest v22 attack (the team selling into buyers) into a non-event: there is nothing above spot to sell into on day one.</div>\n  </div>\n\n  <div class=\"point\">\n    <div class=\"point-title\">02 \u00b7 The 35% bonus is a discount. \"No discounted paper\" is false, isn't it?</div>\n    <span class=\"point-label\">Holds</span>\n    <div class=\"point-text\">The sharpest wording attack on the new model. The defence is that the docs disclose the thing before anyone computes it: ~$0.037 effective entry is printed in the WP and the Brief, the bonus size and its month 1 unlock are stated, and the claim being made is the narrow one, nothing dumps on day one, nobody bought below the price the market pays at TGE. That's true as written. Keep the claim scoped exactly that way in anything new: \"no day-one discount\" survives scrutiny, a bare \"no discount\" would not.</div>\n  </div>\n\n  <div class=\"point\">\n    <div class=\"point-title\">03 \u00b7 31.75% circulating at TGE. That's a huge float for a fair-launch story.</div>\n    <span class=\"point-label\">Holds</span>\n    <div class=\"point-text\">Pre-empted correctly and in both public voices: 23.25 points is the pool itself, the book rather than holders, 5 points paid listing price, 3.5 points is $175K of operating float, and the WP states the split \"so nobody has to compute it against us.\" The Degen Edition repeats it in its own register. This is the same disclosure discipline v22 praised, applied to the new numbers.</div>\n  </div>\n\n  <div class=\"point\">\n    <div class=\"point-title\">04 \u00b7 How does 23.25% of supply deploy against $250K of ETH at $0.05?</div>\n    <span class=\"point-label watch\">Open</span>\n    <div class=\"point-text\">The one mechanical question the final WP leaves unanswered. At spot, $250K of ETH pairs with $250K of tokens, 5M at listing, yet the WP says the full 23.25M deploys at TGE with nothing held back. That only works with concentrated liquidity placing the remaining tokens in ranges above spot, which is precisely what the retired 14-rung ladder used to specify, and the WP even name-drops concentrated-liquidity AMMs without connecting the dot. The claim is almost certainly fine; the explanation is missing. One paragraph in Section 16 stating how the token side is ranged (and what happens to realized ETH as ranges fill) closes the sharpest technical question a DeFi-literate reader will ask, and the ladder sim's math is sitting in the archive ready to be repurposed for it.</div>\n  </div>\n\n  <div class=\"point\">\n    <div class=\"point-title\">05 \u00b7 Team, Dev, and Marketing fully vested by month 25. Isn't that fast?</div>\n    <span class=\"point-label\">Holds</span>\n    <div class=\"point-text\">It's fast, and the docs choose to own it as a feature: no four-year overhang, no cliff event years out, ~$66K a month stated up front, everything visible on published addresses. The counterweight an investor will raise, what keeps the team aligned after month 25, has a real answer already in the model: the team's economics after full vest are the platform's revenue and the token it holds, and the swarm payroll runs to month 70+ regardless. Worth having that sentence ready verbally; it doesn't need to be in the WP.</div>\n  </div>\n\n  <div class=\"point\">\n    <div class=\"point-title\">06 \u00b7 Zero VC and a raise that all goes to the pool. What funds the build?</div>\n    <span class=\"point-label\">Holds</span>\n    <div class=\"point-text\">The honest answer is thin and stated: $175K of operating tranches at listing, ~$66K a month of calendar vesting, and 75% of revenue from a product that is already live with eleven sections. The model deliberately trades war chest for credibility, and the Brief turns the constraint into the pitch: no pressure, no panic, guerilla by design. It holds because the product predates the raise; it would not hold for a whitepaper-only project, and nobody should ever be allowed to frame it as if it would.</div>\n  </div>\n\n  <div class=\"point\">\n    <div class=\"point-title\">07 \u00b7 Publishing the sims invites everyone to attack them. Smart?</div>\n    <span class=\"point-label\">Holds</span>\n    <div class=\"point-text\">Yes, because the Receipts doc is built to be attacked: methods explained in plain language, 25 MC runs per cell, sensitivity sweeps on the exact parameters a critic would target, limits printed beside every headline, and a standing offer that beta data reruns everything. The one discipline to hold: when a measured number breaks a published result, update the doc before anyone else notices, because the standing offer is now a public commitment.</div>\n  </div>\n\n  <div class=\"point\">\n    <div class=\"point-title\">08 \u00b7 \"First token economy on Robinhood Chain\" appears in the Brief only</div>\n    <span class=\"point-label watch\">Watch</span>\n    <div class=\"point-text\">A verifiable, falsifiable claim that lives in one public doc and not the master. It's a strong line and probably why it's there, but it has a shelf life the other claims don't: it must still be true at TGE, and anyone can check. Either verify it stands the week of launch and keep it, or soften to \"bringing a full on-chain token economy to Robinhood Chain,\" which the same paragraph already uses. Cheap to fix now, awkward to walk back later.</div>\n  </div>\n</div>\n\n<div class=\"section\" id=\"s5\">\n  <div class=\"section-number\">Section 05</div>\n  <h2>Open Items</h2>\n\n  <div class=\"disc-card\">\n    <div class=\"disc-title\">01 \u00b7 The Pool Deployment Paragraph \u00b7 The One WP Item</div>\n    <div class=\"disc-text\">Write the sentence the ladder used to be: how 23.25M tokens deploy against $250K ETH at a $0.05 spot, presumably as concentrated-liquidity ranges, and what the rule is for realized ETH as ranges fill. Stress test 04 is the only technical hole in the public tier and it's one paragraph deep. Everything else on this list can wait; this one should land before the WP is treated as frozen.</div>\n  </div>\n\n  <div class=\"disc-card amber\">\n    <div class=\"disc-title\">02 \u00b7 Public Tier Micro-Pass \u00b7 Four Nits</div>\n    <div class=\"disc-text\">Degen: fix the duplicated caption phrase and align 1,500+ to 2,700+ simulated months. 2-Pager: resolve the \"Private &amp; Confidential\" stamp against its public status. Fifteen minutes of edits and the public five are spotless.</div>\n  </div>\n\n  <div class=\"disc-card amber\">\n    <div class=\"disc-title\">03 \u00b7 Archive the Superseded Sims</div>\n    <div class=\"disc-text\">Sim Series v1, Sim v4, Price Path v4, and Sim v5 Ladder are replaced by the Receipts and describe economics that no longer exist, the ladder doc most of all. Stamp each one superseded with a pointer to the Receipts. Zero modeling work, pure labeling, and it prevents the exact quote-the-old-doc failure mode two reviews have now documented.</div>\n  </div>\n\n  <div class=\"disc-card amber\">\n    <div class=\"disc-title\">04 \u00b7 Dev Doc Constants \u00b7 Nearly Done</div>\n    <div class=\"disc-text\">Build Spec v2 needs its one $30/mo changed to $50/mo. The Build Brief still needs the pass v22 asked for: kill conveyor, re-anchor from v15.1 to the final WP, update billing numbers. The spec already defers to the WP so nothing structural moves.</div>\n  </div>\n\n  <div class=\"disc-card amber\">\n    <div class=\"disc-title\">05 \u00b7 GTM Refresh \u00b7 Carried Again</div>\n    <div class=\"disc-text\">BD Targets and Beta Checklist to $50/mo and eleven sections, Actors &amp; Barriers retired or rebuilt from the WP's own Section 02, Most Wanted re-anchored whenever it moves toward approval. Third review carrying this item. None of it is blocking, all of it is an hour, and the beta outreach these docs exist for is presumably getting closer, not further.</div>\n  </div>\n\n  <div class=\"highlight\"><p>One paragraph of pool math, four public nits, and a labeling pass. Nothing on this list touches the token model, the mechanics, or any live claim in the public five. The set is closer to done than it has ever been.</p></div>\n</div>\n\n<div class=\"section\" id=\"s6\">\n  <div class=\"section-number\">Section 06</div>\n  <h2>Verdict</h2>\n  <div class=\"tagline-card\">\n    <div class=\"tagline-big\">9.7 \u00b7 The public tier is aligned for the first time in the project's history. One paragraph of pool math separates this from the 9.8 that v22 promised.</div>\n    <div class=\"tagline-sub\">Final Review v23 \u00b7 Full Set \u00b7 5 Public \u00b7 July 2026 \u00b7 Internal Only</div>\n  </div>\n  <p>The repositioning is the story of this release, and it's the right one. Dropping from a $30M ambition to a $5M floor traded a valuation the ladder had to earn for an entry nobody can attack, and the honesty infrastructure moved with it: the float stated before anyone computes it, the effective bonus entry printed in plain sight, the operating budget disclosed down to the monthly dollar, and six simulations rebuilt from scratch on the final numbers with their limits printed next to their headlines. The v22 open list is essentially cleared: the 2-pager rebuilt, the verifier bar decided the way the project's own research said to decide it, the economy sims rerun by replacement. The public and internal split then solves the disease rather than the symptom: the surface that must stay consistent is now five named documents, and today all five agree.</p>\n  <p>The 9.8 is withheld for one reason with a name: the ladder was removed from the model but the question it answered was not, and the WP currently asserts a full-allocation deployment its own text no longer explains. Write that paragraph, run the fifteen-minute nit pass on the public five, stamp the archive, and the next review has nothing left to score but the launch itself.</p>\n</div>\n\n<div class=\"footer\">\n  <div class=\"footer-logo\">SLEUTH</div>\n  <div class=\"footer-text\">Final Review v23 \u00b7 Full Doc Set \u00b7 Internal \u00b7 July 2026</div>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n" } style={{ width: "100%", minHeight: "100vh", border: "none", display: "block", background: "#060606" }} />
</div>
